Discussion about this post

User's avatar
T J Putnam's avatar

Trade is a difficult idea for those who are interested in studying geopolitics. Over the lifetime of MFN I’ve come to appreciate that Sam is a pragmatist par excellence, a true solution provider. Essential for a trade operative. However, when one looks at the geopolitics of US autarky historically in relation to the rest of the world one quickly bumps up against the reasons for the US position re the GDP export/import realities of much of the rest of the world. Perry Anderson, Chossudovsky, Engdahl, Diana Johnstone, Blum, all from differing perspectives show us why the world is where it is today.

Expand full comment
There and Where's avatar

China, Japan, S.Korea, Malaysia etc. all played the WTO game and grew their economies dramatically. According to these countries no trade barriers is a good thing if you use that advantage to your advantage.

The UK seems to have an economics establishment that is internationalist and ideological. It does not think in terms of "how can I help my neighbours here" but instead floats somewhere over the Atlantic with one foot in the EU and the other in the USA.

The EU and our recent trade agreements have been an unmitigated disaster for the UK. See https://therenwhere.substack.com/p/the-economics-of-brexit

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts